<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Computer Backup Software &#187; Exact Copy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerbackupsoftware.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=exact-copy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerbackupsoftware.co.uk</link>
	<description>Your Computer Backup Software Solution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Backup for Windows Vista or Second Copy backup software?</title>
		<link>http://www.computerbackupsoftware.co.uk/?p=188</link>
		<comments>http://www.computerbackupsoftware.co.uk/?p=188#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Backup Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exact Copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerbackupsoftware.co.uk/backup-software/microsoft-backup-for-windows-vista-or-second-copy-backup-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/cc/backup_software88.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/cc/backup_software88.jpg" title='backup software' alt='backup software' /></a></div>
<div><em><strong>axelclark2</strong> asked: </em><br/><br/><br/>Is there any advantage to running a program like Second Copy instead of Microsoft Backup for Vista?  Second Copy is a exact copy while Microsoft separates into many folders.  I already have a license for second copy, but I&#8217;m not sure if it is an advantage to use it.  It looks cleaner, but maybe Microsoft is doing a better job of copying the files I need.<br/><br/><a href='http://www.freeipoditouch.co.uk'>Free iPod</a> Get a free ipod today!</div>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/cc/backup_software88.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/cc/backup_software88.jpg" title='backup software' alt='backup software' /></a></div>
<div><em><strong>axelclark2</strong> asked: </em><br/><br/><br/>Is there any advantage to running a program like Second Copy instead of Microsoft Backup for Vista?  Second Copy is a exact copy while Microsoft separates into many folders.  I already have a license for second copy, but I&#8217;m not sure if it is an advantage to use it.  It looks cleaner, but maybe Microsoft is doing a better job of copying the files I need.<br/><br/><a href='http://www.freeipoditouch.co.uk'>Free iPod</a> Get a free ipod today!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.computerbackupsoftware.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=188</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
